Hassett and Donnelly  
   
   
 

Recent News

Hassett Nominated By His Peers as One of "Best Lawyers in America" in the field of Personal Injury Defense Litigation
MetroWest Daily News
David F. Hassett of Northborough, managing partner of Hassett & Donnelly P.C., a litigation defense law firm with offices in Worcester and Hartford, Conn., was recently selected by his peers for inclusion in "The Best Lawyers in America" 2012 in the field of "Personal Injury Litigation — Defendants." more

Hassett and Donnelly Adds Lynch to Worcester Office
Worcester Business Journal
Hassett & Donnelly, P.C., an insurance defense trial practice firm, announced today that Tara E. Lynch of Worcester, MA has joined the firm as an attorney in its Worcester office. more

Hassett & Donnelly Looks To Insurance Capital
Worcester Business Journal
The firm's Hartford operations will be focused on "insurance coverage cases and bad-faith claims. more

Movers & Shakers
Hartford Business Journal
The law firm of Hassett & Donnelly, PC, an insurance defense trial practice firm, has added two attorneys to its new Hartford office. more

The Ten Commandments of Cross-Examination: A Trial Lawyer's Commentary on the Insights of Irving Younger
International Association of Defense Counsel Trial and Tactics Newsletter
Cross-examination can be one of the most important and exciting aspects of trying a case. But it is also one of the most challenging components of a trial, and errors in cross-examination can at times make or break a case. more

Recent Verdicts/Judgments/
Motions

Summary Judgment
Court: Massachusetts District Court/BMC Appellate Division
March 2010
Where a plaintiff injured in a car accident has brought a personal injury claim against the defendants allegedly responsible, the defendants must be granted summary judgment in light of the plaintiff's prior recovery in an arbitration proceeding against the insurer of the rental car that collided with hers. (more)

Summary Judgment
Court: Massachusetts Superior Court
January 2010
Where (1) a plaintiff child skier was injured when a defendant snowboarder collided with him, (2) a tort claim filed by the plaintiff against the defendant was settled and (3) the plaintiff has sued the codefendant insurance company which sold the snowboarder's mother a homeowner's policy, claiming that the insurer violated G.L.c. 93A, I hold that judgment should enter for the codefendant insurer because the plaintiff has not demonstrated that the insurer failed to make a reasonable settlement offer at a time when liability had become clear. (more)